Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 23:53

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Boulder attack updates: Multiple people injured in 'act of terror,' FBI says - ABC News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What can you do if you are a full-grown adult, but never experienced being a child?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Be a super-ager — and join the ‘wellderly’ - The Times
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Can adults grow new brain cells? - Live Science
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Can you write a letter to your first love without mentioning his/her name?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Rangers Place Tyler Mahle On 15-Day Injured List, Recall Kumar Rocker - MLB Trade Rumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.